About this post
Type of technique: breaking rules and forming thought experiments
Technique in a nutshell: write a simple fact about something. Example: cows produce milk. Then force a conditional aspect using 'if': cows produce milk IF they are alive. Experiment with replacement for the 'alive': dead, elderly, male etc.
I've been finding that this IF-forcing approach can lead to ideas. Especially simple ideas. I start by writing down a fact about the subject and then working out how the fact is conditional by using 'if'.
So, for example, with subject 'gun' I write down a fact about a gun:
a gun fires.
Using 'if' to find the conditional aspect gives:
A gun fires if you pull the trigger.
Then I can play about with the condition or parts of the condition. I can remove the subsequent part of the sentence giving:
A gun fires if...
and then consider alternatives such as:
A gun fires if you breathe onto it
A gun fires if you hold it above your head
A gun fires if you point it towards yourself
That last one is an interesting concept for fiction. A gun could be made in a way that makes a bullet fly in the opposite direction. So the 'baddie' can put the gun in their mouth to look as though they are about to shoot themselves when really the bullet will fly in the normal direction.
I can keep the sentence as it stands:
A gun fires if you pull the trigger
and opt to change just one word:
A gun fires if you pull TWO triggers.
Which would be a more secure gun.
It's worth writing down as many conditional aspects as possible:
A gun fires if it is loaded
A gun fires if it has a barrel
A gun fires if it works
A gun fires if you are carrying one in the first place
A gun fires if you have fingers
A gun fires if the bullet is live
It's quite a simple yet effective method for finding assumptions.